Showing posts with label "let the same mind be in you as in Christ Jesus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label "let the same mind be in you as in Christ Jesus. Show all posts

Monday, April 3, 2017

The Mind of Christ –– Palm/Passion Sunday, Year A –– 9 April 2017

This is a day for careful reading of the scripture. Bring it to life. Invite a variety of voices. But even an excellent reading does not make a sermon unnecessary. The text resides in a realm that needs, still, to be brought “home.” How does this astonishing story resound in our lives? Tell us that. What does it mean to have the “mind of Christ”?

This day is supreme paradox. Hosanna to the victorious king! Riding on a donkey. Then arrested, tried, and executed. Hosanna!

Some Christians want the imagery of our stories to be clean, uncomplicated, and one-dimensional. This day is not that. Instead, we are invited by the Palms and Passion put together that the God we worship is strong enough to be weak enough for truth. We are to see that power comes from vulnerability, that victory is assured where it is not expected or understood. This is not a God who comes to us in a form we comprehend easily. For that kind of understanding, we need paradox.

Here, at the beginning of Holy Week, the center of our lives, we see the whole story, so that on Maundy Thursday we can understand why we are called to wash each other’s feet. On Good Friday we are called to pay the greatest honor to Jesus’ cross – without which no resurrection could occur. On Saturday when we sit Vigil beside the grave and hear the great stories of God’s people, we are shown all the evidence for faith, and then the stone is rolled away.

Matthew 26:14––27:66

When considered from a critical perspective, what the narrative tells us is: the earliest memory of what took place is that both religious and political authorities came together and Jesus was crucified. We find it plausible that the temple priesthood sensed their own fortunes could be threatened if Jesus decided to apply his popularity to an insurrection against Rome. As for Pilate, any suggestion of a possible sedition would have sealed the potential leader's fate. The sign on the cross, “Jesus King of the Jews,” is Rome's understanding of why it crucified Jesus.

Apart from these points, the details of these narratives were fashioned from knowledge of crucifixions, reflections drawn from the psalms and suffering servant songs. Perhaps some memories originated with women who watched from afar, or even with Simon the Cyrenian. . . The story, however, is for Christians a way to enter into a real event that came to be understood as salvific as well as how God has chosen to identify with all human suffering. –– Regina Boisclair

Isaiah 50:4-9a

The servant described in Isaiah is a disciple of God, called by God and instructed by God. The servant faithfully executes his instructions, often suffering because of them. The servant can only endure the suffering because he is confident that God will vindicate him. God is with him, so his confidence is not in his own strength, but is in the LORD. Those who listen to God are susceptible to suffering, not because God endorses it, but because the ways of God are often in contradiction to the ways of the world. –– Jennifer Copeland

Philippians 2:5-11

This Philippians song tells the same story that the gospels tell: the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. The details are missing, but the essential ingredients are here: descent, humility and servanthood, death on a cross, and exaltation “to the highest place.” It is a song, it is a story, and it was also later one of the resources for Christological debates over the nature and status of Jesus. “Being in very nature God” is how my translation (NIV) reads, while an alternative states, “in the form of God” (NAB). This is followed by “being made in human likeness” (NIV). Although it might seem that a song was a poor source for highly technical philosophical distinctions, this is one of several from which all sides in ancient theological discussions took their proof-texts.

. . . Song let Christians be daring in claims about Jesus. This and other songs opened up ways to use metaphors, to play with speech, and to draw richly on traditional resources from the Hebrew Bible's poetry. . . . Moreover, it is important to stress that the songs of the New Testament were already embedded in Christian worship before they became embedded in texts such as epistles. –– Lucy Bregman

The holy scriptures, in other words, arose from the language and patterns of worship in the early church. Let this Sunday bring the people of God in your life to the Three Days of deepened ritual signification so that the paradox of life from death can become a way of seeing and living.


Lucy Bregman, professor of religion at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, is the author of several books including Beyond Silence and Denial: Death and Dying Reconsidered (WJK, 1999) and Preaching Death (Baylor Univ., 2011).

Jennifer Copeland, a United Methodist ordained minister, served for 16 years as chaplain at Duke University and as director of the Duke Wesley Fellowship. She is currently executive director at North Carolina Council of Churches in Raleigh-Durham.

Regina Boisclair, a Roman Catholic biblical scholar, teaches at Alaska Pacific University, Anchorage, Alaska.


Homily Service 41, no. 2 (2008): 68-77.




Monday, March 14, 2016

Emptiness as Salvation – 20 March 2016 – Palm/ Passion Sunday

As you begin to ponder what the sermon on this highly charged Sunday ought to contain, let the wisdom of writers from Homily Service in 2007 dealing with the Passion story serve as yeast for your thoughts.

Luke 22:14–23:56 or 23:1-49

In no place in the passion according to Luke, as set forth in our lectionaries, do we even come close to getting a clue as to why some authorities in Jesus' day wanted him out of the way. . . The Gospels (Luke included) routinely offer exaggerated impressions of sizeable crowds and high drama in the events leading up to the cross. This exaggeration is to be expected. The authors are convinced that the death of this man had cosmic significance. If that significance had not been apparent to the immediate witnesses, why should the Christians of the evangelists' communities recognize this either?

Instead, the far more realistic image is of a small man, from an insignificant part of the nation, with a small group of followers, caught up in a conflagration and put down because of it with no thought or hesitation on the part of the Roman occupation forces. In no way does the more realistic image necessarily subtract from the cosmic and atoning significance of Jesus' death.

I suggest, instead, a more modest account of the passion allows us to appreciate the incredible interpretive task undertaken by the earliest communities of Christians. The audacity of reading their scriptures as having been fulfilled in the life and death of this man! The audacity of God in using the death of this man to teach humanity the impotence and utter vacuousness of scapegoating and sacrifice! – Jeffrey VanderWilt

Isaiah 50:4-9a

Isaiah frequently pursues the story of Israel, humiliated, exiled, and now restored to its imperial ambitions. This “reversal of fortune” story implies also a theology of atonement. . . [which] may have a substitutionary character—Israel suffers and bears a God-given burden so that the nations do not have to. . . .

Christians found this theology of atonement, implicit to the story of the servant of God who suffers, strongly and compellingly attractive as they tried to put together the pieces of the story of Jesus of Nazareth, the healing rabbi, who proclaimed the restoration of the kingdom of God, and yet who suffered and died so grievously so that, when his fortune was reversed in resurrection, the nations would turn and glorify the God who saved Jesus. – Jeffrey VanderWilt

Philippians 2:5-11

Here is the One who emptied himself, who humbled himself, who became obedient. In letting others do what they would to him, this is what Jesus did: He chose the identity he would have as others did their worst. He emptied himself to take the form of a slave, when by all rights he could assume full equality with God. He impoverished himself for the sake of his fellow human beings. He offered himself.

And we, too, are called to offer ourselves, to “let the same mind be in” us as we choose our personal identity in this world, to think as he did when others would do their worst to us. . . .

Here is the One who, on the cross, offers words of forgiveness for those who crucified him, words of promise for those who trust in him, words of commendation to the Father whose will he obeys. Here is the One who eats and drinks with sinners, the One whom death cannot hold. . . .  

He gave himself for us. In what wounded him is our healing. In what nailed him to the cross is our freedom. In the offering of his life is our life, eternal life. – Paul G. Bieber


Paul Bieber is pastor of All Saints Lutheran Church, San Diego, California.  

Jeffery VanderWilt, author of Communion with Non-Catholic Christians (Collegville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2003) teaches at Santa Margarita Catholic High School in Southern California.



Homily Service 40, no. 5 (2007): 3-20.